Let’s start with SOLO taxonomy; students are classified
into five categories; first category is pre-structural
student who do not have the basic information about the subject matter
and I think Direct Instructional (DI) could be useful in this
situation with some technology tools/techniques to present the curriculum, this
could be applied for example in teaching English as a foreign language for our
foundation student, this approach would be effective for providing information
or developing step-by-step skills; second and third categories are uni-structural/multi-structural
student who have the basic information
but from one angle or multi angle but only as a Surface Understanding as the
student is not being able to put this information together to form a solid knowledge
and I think interactive lecturing could be useful in this case to
increase the students engagement inside the classroom in order to foster deeper
understanding of the course content through group discussion and practice by
doing; fourth and fifth categories are relational/extended abstract student who
have the deep understanding in the subject matter and I think Problem/Project
based (PBL) approach could be used to develop to achieve the
deep understanding and build the critical thinking skills needed in real life environment.
Personally; I would go with a combination of the above approaches
(DI, PBL, and Interactive learning) as we have different levels of students in our
classroom and to align ourselves with a level-3 teacher who is concern is about
what a student does and the product or the learning outcome of the teaching.
Regarding Bloom’s taxonomy; I think a combination
of PBL & interactive lecturing would be an essential teaching
approaches in any classroom if we want our students to gain the creating,
evaluating, analysis, applying, and understanding skills;
I think that Direct Instruction (DI) could be useful in remembering
and achieving understanding.
Regarding Assessments; for formative assessments
(just-in-time information on what students know or can do) I would go with Case
study, group activity, and researches which a reflection to the teaching approaches
using PBL & interactive lecturing (also teacher & students can pinpoint
to the concepts those are not clear yet or misunderstood (metacognition)); for
summative assessments (reflect students understanding during the course or a
unit (module)) I would go with projects which a reflection to PBL teaching approach
as exam should test the ability to explain, relate, prove, and apply (same as
the teacher intention).
No comments:
Post a Comment